Ethics Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Ethics Critique - Essay ExampleIf the drivers are hearty understood, it is practical to absolve the moral sagaciousness using psychological research. However, roughly people will suck up moral judgment without being driven by whatsoever(prenominal)thing but out of other factors such as influence. Sometimes, it may be unrealizable to differentiate if the decision was made for accustomed motives or out of influence. In such cases, it becomes impossible to use psychological research to justify the moral judgment. This essay argues that the capability of psychological research to justify moral judgment depends on whether the motives and factors leading the judgment are understood. Psychological research which explains how human beings make moral judgments can be used to justify a given judgment or satisfy. Although on that point is no clear reason, why people make certain choices and not others, people will tend to justify their actions depending on the circumstances. In G reenes (363) opinion, man wish to make judgments based on reasoning. However, well-nigh of them end up making their decisions based on emotions. Therefore, if the emotions are well understood, it is possible to understand how humans will justify their actions, or the possible reasons that they will give for their actions. In Greene opinion, (364) People tend to put up emotional responses to individualal moral violations, responses that incline them to judge against performing those actions. However, it sometimes becomes hard to justify actions since some people make decisions without even thinking. It is only after making a decision that humans effort to reason as they seek to justify their action or decide if it was right or incorrect. Since it is well understood that people tend to make decisions depending on their intuitions, it only requires the researcher to understand the intuitions of the psyche making the decision to be able to tell the way they will justify their act ions. Since there are no reasons for doing certain actions, it is possible to predict the way people will justify their moral judgment. It is possible to justify moral judgment using psychological research since people will justify actions as wrong or right depending on how the society views certain actions. Aristotle (173-174) claims that if a certain action is perceived to be wrong and a person commits it, it is obvious that he or she will try to find any reasons that will make the action appear right. Therefore, it only requires one to understand perceptions of the society regarding certain actions to be able to predict or tell how the doer of any action will justify it. another(prenominal) reason why psychological research can be used to justify a given judgment is that some actions are performed out of obedience and not reason. It thus requires the researcher to know the pauperism behind certain action. If an action of political aggression is performed, the doer will obviously justify the action by giving political reasons. For example, a dictator is likely to justify their dictatorial actions by demonstrating why humans require to be forced to act in a certain way. A person doing charity work will justify their actions by finding reasons on how their actions are helpful to others. Additionally, Milgram (184) posits that some actions are performed out of rebellion. If the researcher understands the nature of person performing a given action, then it is possible to justify the action without understanding the reason behind it. It only requires one to understand the nature of the person doing the action to be able to pre